- A.I believe that the elected government should decide on all issues, because it has the mandate (command) of the people to do what they think is right on every issue. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I believe that the opinion of the people should be consulted. I do not consider the elected government authorized for everything and I believe that along with the right information, alternatives should be given and the people should decide by electronic referendums. It is wrong for an elected official to be considered or rather to consider himself infallible and empowered by the world to make decisions on any critical emergency that may arise… MORE… 67%, 2 votes2 votes 67%2 votes - 67% of all votes
- C. Not sure or no idea 33%, 1 vote1 vote 33%1 vote - 33% of all votes
- D. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.I don't want to answer this question. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
When in an emergency-unpredictable situation you cannot convince of the necessity and just of measures and decisions, so that they are consciously accepted, you must impose them with fear and punishment. But the unjust measures or those that do not convince the people, bring denial, anger, outburst, uprising.
At least when there is public opinion, this is an indication of fairness and a consolation that comes from respecting the opinion of many. Otherwise it seems like arbitrariness, like a latent democracy.
A person's beliefs are not a joke, they are the person himself. Only when convinced, someone is obedient and cooperates. Anyone can respect fair laws, but not the opinion of governments that think they are expressing the public opinion.
The procedures should be modernized and done electronically, like direct-urgent referendums, to cost less, to have ease, transparency and to ensure the integrity of the process. As it happens with paying taxes and online shopping, so that it is done quickly, there is cross-check of data and fraud is prevented, so the investigation of the desire of the people could be ensured!
Democracy must become an evolving and self-improving system, otherwise it will end up like a museum, like Acropolis and Parthenon that you can only imagine the glory and the beauty they once had. Even the issue of elections, those with paper ballots must end and be modernized. Let us not forget that in ancient Athens the secret ballots were done with shells (fragments of pottery) but fortunately things evolved and we reached the electronic age.
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A.It depends on the reason and type of homicide. Obviously, our legal system correctly provides separate limits for different cases. Τhere are exceptions too, such as collateral losses in war that cannot be prosecuted because they are inevitable, or some accidents that are many omissions and negligence by various reasons and persons, for example a natural disaster such as fires or floods combined with our society's inability to predict and react and protect our members, the human beings. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.At least 5 years 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- C.At least 10 years 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- D.At least 20 years 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.At least 30 years 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- F.The crime against human life is never erased and never expires, because the value of human life is priceless! 100%, 2 votes2 votes 100%2 votes - 100% of all votes
- G.Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- H.Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- I.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A.I feel that I am a good Christian, because I believe and live according to the commandments of the Lord and I participate in the work of the church in my place and I am satisfied with it because it guides correctly and comforts and enlightens. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I feel that I am a good Christian, because I believe deep inside and I try to do God's will, but I don't participate much in the church of my place, because I don't find the time, although I would really like to. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- C.I feel that I am a good Christian, because I believe deep inside and I try to do God's will, but I do not participate in the church of my place, because I do not find that living, pure and uncontaminated and undying love for our neighbor that God asked of us. Of course, I don't see that this love has been achieved elsewhere, by some other Christian churches, but what I see is that the worship of money has prevailed throughout the world. I think that we have not yet reached this powerful Love, and those who have made it are few and hard to find and do not belong to a specific branch of Christianity but may belong to all the branches, which shows us that this kind of love which we ask for and which has been asked of us by Jesus Christ, it must be hidden in the original message of Christianity, which was transmitted by the Apostles when they established churches in His name, all united as a Christian Church of Love. I don't believe in a pan-religion, I don't care, it doesn't concern me, but I would like to see God's love reign and unity and peace and justice in the world. 100%, 1 vote1 vote 100%1 vote - 100% of all votes
- D.I feel that I am not a good Christian, because I have begun to doubt, question, mistrust, not believe much and not be convinced by the Church, although I generally try to be a good person. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.Maybe I am considered a Christian because I was baptized, but I actually don't feel that I am, and only have the name in the “papers” and statistics! I don't believe that all this is true, but it’s the tradition and fairy tales and I don’t like the Church and the Priests and I consider them anachronistic, like they live in the past. Maybe there is a God, but I'm not convinced that He is as described by those who think they know it all. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- F.Maybe I am considered a Christian because I was baptized, but I don't believe that God exists. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- G. Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- H. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- I.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A.I believe that it is good that the President is elected by the parties, because the members of the parliament are elected by the people and they must choose someone they can work with. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I believe that it is not right for the President to be elected by the parties and he/she should be elected by the people. The President must not have a symbolic and formal character, but must have the strength and power so that he/she can really respond to the sacred duty of the regulator of the system of government and for this reason she/he must have the esteem, the respect, the love and mandate of the People, so that she/he functions as the guardian of the Republic. 100%, 1 vote1 vote 100%1 vote - 100% of all votes
- C. Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- D. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A. I disagree. This is our society and unfortunately accidents happen. We cannot predict everything, nor can we protect everyone, nor can we hold everyone jointly responsible if someone loses their life unjustly and unnecessarily. These things happen too. Justice works fine, I wish other sectors worked like this. There are other more serious issues that we should improve first. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I agree that human life is extremely important and that if one of our fellow human beings loses his life due to errors or omissions, or criminal acts that could be foreseen, then there should be serious and immediate sanctions on the Judges who did not take care of correcting the behavior or imprisonment of the dangerous person for his fellow human beings and for the police officers and for the public officials and every person is co-responsible, like those who establish the laws of Justice, and therefore also those who vote for them and elect them. Everyone should be charged with the share of responsibility that corresponds to him. There is no one who is exempt from the responsibility of what he should have done to prevent evil and to produce and do and create good. Even all of us, the so-called “ordinary” people, the majority of the world who are neither politicians, nor TV stars, nor idol athletes or recognizable musicians who stand out from the crowd where we belong, even we have a small share of responsibility and this is what others pay for with remorse and guilty feelings, or others console themselves with the phrase “Unfortunately we can’t do anything”. But the judge who released someone dangerous and he went and killed, has a greater responsibility, unless he was forced by the law, in which case the responsibility passes to the legislator. It is written in the Constitution that the primary obligation of the State is to respect and protect the value of the human being! We alone give value to ourselves and to the society we live in. Others will not do it for us. Have we achieved the just society and the value that we as human beings deserve? Obviously, this is not the only solution to all our problems, but we still have many global things to fix so that human life can acquire the value it deserves in Gaza and Ukraine and in many other parts of the world where it has been humiliated, lowering the bar of its value. 100%, 1 vote1 vote 100%1 vote - 100% of all votes
- C. Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- D. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
How precious human life is? If something predictable happens and people's lives are unprotected, it is not possible to accept it as inevitable. And many things happen! Wars, destructive fires, railway, air, automobile, nuclear accidents, but also individual murders. Of course, there are also the Tragic Accidents from Earthquakes or Hurricanes or other unforeseen natural disasters, or health issues that man cannot do anything more than ask for the help of the God he believes in. But do we accept all the unpredictable and the predictable as inevitable? Have we done everything we could to prevent our neighbors' war, since when our neighbor's house catches fire, ours may soon be in danger too?
Did we do everything we could to save these women who turned to the State to seek protection from oppressive and abusive and violent partners? Eleni had also gone to Rhodes to seek help, but she was discouraged and prevented due to the complex procedures and the required evidence. Another girl had also gone and had managed to get restrictive measures issued, which unfortunately were not enough to stop her murderer. Julie Douib had also gone to ask for help many times from the police and the prosecutor's office in Corsica, screaming that she was threatened and in danger, but they replied that "if your violent ex-husband doesn't use his gun, we can't do anything!" Condemned to die, and all of us, simple uninvolved viewers of a living thriller next to us, we can now watch the documentary that was filmed with the title "My Violent Husband" about the sudden cutting of the thread of her short, full of agony and horror, tragic life, about how her husband finally used his gun. Unfortunately this time we really can't do anything for her, but we could do for the next ones crying for help. Kyriaki had also gone to the Police Station and they mocked her, telling her that the police are not taxis and they asked her for some money for the fee, so that she could file a lawsuit, which unfortunately the girl did not have on her. And her murderer was outside, waiting for her.
There are some things that we accept as inevitable and that is the only way they can be accepted, and there are also some things that we cannot accept because we can avoid them.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLXiNKfWwx0
https://www.tovima.gr/2021/06/28/world/gynaikoktonia-pagkosmia-mastiga-san-mia-deyteri-pandimia/
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A.Ι disagree, because not all people can put labels on their publications, especially when they want to make jokes and teases, or if they want to make themselves appear more beautiful than they think they really are, with magical-virtual filters. For those that cannot distinguish truth from lies, that’s their own problem and everyone must be careful for themselves. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I believe that the true and the false should be distinguishable in the flow of online information and entertainment and that the spread of fake news and deception, whether as a form of humor or as satire, should be truly illegal. Anyone can "make", "upload" and "download" any idea, any photo they want, any video, but there should be a sign that shows whether it is true or false, reality or fantasy, so that we know whether we should laugh or cry and not be deceived and laugh at the serious and cry at the funny, nor be dazzled by the false and devalue the real. Anyone who deceives and misleads should have consequences, proportional to their intentions and the effects of their actions, on others. 100%, 1 vote1 vote 100%1 vote - 100% of all votes
- C. Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- D. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.
- A.I believe that parliamentary immunity is well implemented so that MPs can freely carry out their work without fear of being prosecuted for their choices. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- B.I believe it is wrong to apply parliamentary immunity because we should all be equal before the laws and no one above them. We must all take responsibility for our actions and if one has immunity it leads to arbitrariness and indifference. 100%, 1 vote1 vote 100%1 vote - 100% of all votes
- C. Not sure or no idea 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- D. Not interested 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
- E.I don't want to answer this question yet. 0%, 0 votes0 votes0 votes - 0% of all votes
The results of the voting do not represent the common opinion of the world or all internet users, but they carry the weight of the opinion of the number of people who voted in Cosmovote. When end if, a large-proper number of people vote in Cosmovote, then we will be able to claim that the voting represents the common opinion of the world.


